YouTubers Are About to Become Much More Popular

But it won’t mean much — except as another pain point for radio.

Standards are only standards so long as everyone agrees to abide by them.

And starting Monday, YouTube is changing one of its biggest.

Beginning August 24, a view will register the moment a video starts playing, from the very first frame. Duration won’t matter. Someone can click, immediately decide they’ve made a terrible mistake, and leave.

And that counts as a view.

Until now, YouTube required someone watching a regular long-form video to stick around for roughly 30 seconds before that view counted. There was at least some indication that the person actually watched something.

The company says it’s “standardizing” views across its different formats, including Shorts, and that the new measurement will better reflect a creator’s exposure and make it easier to demonstrate that creator’s value to brand partners.

There is an important distinction here. YouTube will still measure what it calls “engaged views,” and the change won’t alter how creators qualify for the YouTube Partner Program or how their earnings are calculated. YouTube will still know whether people actually watched. It just won’t require that for the big number displayed under the video.

Radio has gone through its own version of changing the ruler.

Nielsen changed the way radio quarter-hours are measured, reducing the amount of listening required for a PPM panelist to qualify from five minutes to three minutes.

That change gave radio bigger numbers, too.

But it’s still a standard. A listen doesn’t count because somebody tuned in for a second and immediately tuned back out. They have to listen for a measurable amount of time.

I put my music on Bandcamp, and when I look at the streaming numbers, there’s a distinction between a skip, a partial play, and a complete play. Those distinctions matter because they tell me something. Did somebody encounter my music? Did somebody try it? Did somebody actually listen to it?

Those are three very different things. And they inform me. A song with many skips is one I might need to rethink. A song with lots of full plays tells me people are sticking with it. A song with lots of partial plays tells me they gave it a chance, but something made them stop.

That’s useful information.

YouTube is about to take the first one and publicly call it a “view.”

Garrett Searight at Barrett Media raises an interesting question about what this means for broadcasting. Radio companies are currently pushing for changes in federal ownership limits, arguing that they need greater scale to compete with digital platforms.

But they’re not playing by the same measurement rules.

If YouTube can count someone who watches one frame as a viewer, why should broadcasters have to meet a minimum listening threshold before counting someone as a listener?

Take that argument far enough, and the whole concept of “engagement” starts becoming meaningless.

Imagine walking into an advertiser’s office and saying, “Two million people listened to our station!”

For how long?

“Well, some of them might have heard half a second.”

And that’s the problem with metrics once everybody starts changing the definition to make their particular number look better. Eventually, we’re no longer measuring the same thing.

The numbers get bigger while the meaning gets smaller.

Maybe advertisers won’t care. Maybe they’ll look beyond that giant public view count and demand the engagement numbers YouTube still collects behind it.

Or maybe we’re heading toward a media world where every platform gets to invent its own definition of an audience. And all that matters is that one number.

If so, I can play that game, too.

From now on, perhaps I should count someone as having read Archer’s Line if they clicked on an article, saw the first sentence, thought better of it, and disappeared.

Look at those numbers!

Except they wouldn’t tell me what I actually want to know: Did you read it? Did it mean something to you? Did it make you want to come back and read my other articles?

And speaking of numbers that actually mean something, becoming a paid subscriber is one very good way to tell me that what I’m doing here matters to you. There are some changes coming soon to Archer’s Line, and to me personally, and I’d love for you to be here for them.

If a paid subscription isn’t in the cards right now, that’s fine. Becoming a free subscriber counts, too.

Sharing an article with your friends and leaving a comment below help keep this thing going, too.